0 registered
and 3 anonymous users online.
|
|
|
#6062 - 01/11/03 08:52 AM
Cheating myself of lines?
|
Julie W8
Member
Registered: 01/10/99
Posts: 3481
Loc: Los Angeles, CA USA
|
There's a discussion about line counting software going on in another forum. When it was pointed out that MedPen doesn't count headers, more than one poster said they don't use the header function because most software either doesn't count it or it only counts it once -- and they want to be paid for it on each page. They use a hard page break and copy in the header for each page. I know a lot of MTs who do this. But nobody seems to think this is line padding. Am I cheating myself of lines because I think the headers should only be counted once (and put in the automated header where it belongs)?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6063 - 01/11/03 09:33 AM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
Mike
Administrator
Registered: 07/11/98
Posts: 2668
|
Is it line padding if you don't take advantage of all the features/productivity enhancements your word processor offers? How are automated headers/footers any different than expanded text or macros? I've met MTs who don't know how to create automated headers/footers, or don't know how to use the suppression features to make the header on page 2 different than the one on page 1. Some MTs put all their reports in one long document, and don't create proper headers/footers because it's too difficult to start and stop headers on each individual patient. I look at it like using macros and templates. If your contract states that you charge for everything on the page and the client agrees to it, it's not line padding. If you state that you don't charge for headers/footers, then you turn around and do it, it is line padding. When you look at the final printed document does it really matter how any of those characters got on the page? The MT is responsible for making sure the information is correct and appropriate, to the best of her ability. Should the MT be proofing automated headers and macros for internal consistency? If so, why should she not be paid for that?  Mike DeTuri [ 01-11-2003: Message edited by: Mike ]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6064 - 01/11/03 09:37 AM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
Janice M.
Member
Registered: 06/24/99
Posts: 952
Loc: Southern CA
|
quote: But nobody seems to think this is line padding. Am I cheating myself of lines because I think the headers should only be counted once (and put in the automated header where it belongs)?
Do you also discount for expanded words and templates? When I create a header, it takes much more time than it would to even manually type in the material. I don't go to the cut and paste part, I create a header so that it is there, and when I REMEMBER I add the lines that would be created. My accounts that WANT headers know all about my business practice. Janice
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6065 - 01/11/03 09:37 AM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
Janice M.
Member
Registered: 06/24/99
Posts: 952
Loc: Southern CA
|
Oops!!! Somehow I must have hit the button twice. Janice Win big Julie so that you don't have to worry about header charges. [ 01-11-2003: Message edited by: Janice M. ]
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6066 - 01/11/03 09:43 AM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
straws
Member
Registered: 12/15/00
Posts: 2809
Loc: in limbo
|
My only accounts that want headers are also printed accounts. It takes ink to put those characters on the page, and they are part of the process, just like macros (as the others have mentioned). It is only our expertise that allows us to not have to retype it every time. We seem to forget, because it is second nature to us now, that most people cannot navigate their word processing programs like we can. As long as you have outlined what they pay for, it shouldn't be a problem.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6067 - 01/11/03 09:44 AM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
pattyB
Member
Registered: 05/28/99
Posts: 2629
Loc: Rhode Island
|
Julie, On the two IC accounts I do, I charge per 65 characters/spaces period. My contract says nothing specific about headers/footers being paid for only once. Since the header is a necessary part of the record, whether or not you enter it manually (copy/paste) or use an automatic function, the characters in the header do count in calculating your total lines. My way of thinking is that this is similar to a doc not wanting to pay for macros (that we have created)to make our work go faster, but pay only for the keystrokes we use to enter the macro. My doc is paying for the finished product and my expertise in creating that product. It's your personal choice in how you write your contract whether you want to exclude headers and footers after the first page. I do not feel it is unethical in any way to charge and/or pay MTs for headers and footers. Fortunately my counting software (DocuCount) has an option to include ALL headers and footers in the count. As an SC, if I did not have this software and I was supposed to be paid for each incidence of a header/footer, I would not hesitate to copy and paste. Patty
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6068 - 01/11/03 10:26 PM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
HighDesertMT
Member
Registered: 08/10/02
Posts: 243
|
We are addressing a similar problem with help from the Tech Desk forum here. We could not charge for headers/footers mainly because the header was static. It did change on the second page to a more brief header, but that is all automated. The footer required duplicating demographics in four areas; but it remained static thereafter. Sylcount Gold, which we use, counts headers and footers, period, on each page. That wasn't fair to the client. Some MTs were complaining about not being paid for the four fields which text they either went back up into the body to retrieve a piece at a time and pasted in the footer, memorized and sometimes made mistakes, or used the clipboard and copy/paste/F11 to fill in. They were performing work for which they were not being paid. With the help of experienced MTs in Tech, we now are able to type the text once and have it duplicate in the footer. This has solved our problem very nicely. However, even though we do not print the reports (FTP delivery) and use up ink and printer life and additional paper, I guess we still have some hidden revenue loss in the additional time spent uploading/downloading by virtue of additional bytes of data in those headers and footers including facility logos loading at time of transcription. Hmmmmm.... now that would be an arcane revenue enhancement idea!
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6069 - 01/11/03 11:10 AM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
Julie W8
Member
Registered: 01/10/99
Posts: 3481
Loc: Los Angeles, CA USA
|
Janice -- no, I don't charge for templates if they meet my written policy. For example, California has a couple workers' compensation forms and my service specializes in workers' compensation. The PR3 form alone is $20 before anybody even starts typing. The form doesn't change -- nothing gets taken out and all that gets added in is what's dictated. I don't charge for that template. As always, the group is right -- what the contract says is what you charge for. I've just never charged more than once for the headers and footers and some accounts I don't even charge that because it's part of the template and usually their "stationery" so they can print on plain paper.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6070 - 01/11/03 11:33 AM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
14tonks
Member
Registered: 10/25/01
Posts: 5978
Loc: Only 3rd world country in US
|
Well, I do charge for headers and footers. In the first place, the long letterhead header on that first page is a way to bill a little extra for a bunch of short documents, which take more time to process all along the road than one long one. In the second place, billing headers and footers is a way to get paid for some of the time involved in creating and maintaining templates. I will set a lower line rate for some highly automated work, but I always charge for all the lines.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6071 - 01/11/03 11:59 AM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
Julie W8
Member
Registered: 01/10/99
Posts: 3481
Loc: Los Angeles, CA USA
|
Unless I have to use it as a negotiating tool, I charge to set up the templates. Otherwise, I usually charge for the h/f, but only once; i.e., not for every page.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6072 - 01/11/03 04:05 PM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
George Heymont
Member
Registered: 05/04/99
Posts: 4516
Loc: San Francisco, CA
|
I never worry about any of this stuff because we charge by the minute of recorded dictation time.
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6073 - 01/11/03 05:00 PM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
Julie W8
Member
Registered: 01/10/99
Posts: 3481
Loc: Los Angeles, CA USA
|
Maybe I'm just anal, George, but I wouldn't be "not worried" if I charged by the minute of dictation. I'd always be checking to see what the per-line equivalents were and how I was doing in comparison. You've also indicated you handpick your clients carefully and I think that makes a difference. What would you do with a client who uses a lot of normals and templates?
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
#6074 - 01/11/03 07:14 PM
Re: Cheating myself of lines?
|
George Heymont
Member
Registered: 05/04/99
Posts: 4516
Loc: San Francisco, CA
|
With the Chinese stutterer, we asked HIM to use normals for all of his addresses so that he could just say something like "CC35" to give us James K. Yan, M.D. 728 Pacific Avenue, Suite 305 San Francisco, California 94133 It's just easier for us since listening to him is so painful. In order to take on one large clinic, we had to accept doing normals on a specific type of report. But we took on those clients about five years ago. When one or two potential clients have told me they have all these normals and they only want to call out numbers for the reports and not have to pay for anything, I've told them we're not interested in their business. George
|
|
Top
|
|
|
|
Moderator: Annie
|